My Articles

The principle is that some murderers deserve the death penalty less than death as a fair, appropriate and effective punishment. We can’t support a murderer but some times some killings done by accident ,some killings done by self defense and some killings done by taking revenge and of course some killings done intentionally by some notorious person for wrong purpose ,some times many countries face problem with implementation of execution like hanging ,killing with bullets or firing ,they put bad impact on human minds ,though I don’t support these murderers or terrorists those did it purposefully they should be punished but some times innocents also got execution they can be put to rehabilitation - that they may repent of their crime, serve a sentence as punishment, and emerge as a reformed and useful member of society.

Some may argue that why Govt will take care of murderers ,food them for life and take all costs of their living and they are responsible for their punishment ,I think their logic also correct but all murderers are not alike we should understand what forced them to do the crime ,if they did it for their self defense or they did it for taking revenge rightfully(on should not take revenge word in otherwise) then law should give relaxation to them ,because their original character is not like that some circumstances forced them to do so ,and they can be faithful to the society in future .

At the same time I don’t support the culprits who murdered innocent people for looting purpose or any light reason ,they should be executed which can set an example.

What do you think?

Add Post To: | Digg| Technorati| Tip'd| del.icio.us| Stumbleupon| Reddit| BlinkList| Furl| Spurl| Yahoo| Simpy|